ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2025
A Monitoring Method to Evaluate the Accumulation of Antimicrobial-Resistance Genes in Gram-Negative Bacteria Distributed in Environmental Water.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Monitoring Method to Evaluate the Accumulation of Antimicrobial-Resistance Genes in Gram-Negative Bacteria Distributed in Environmental Water.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (AMRB) distributed in the environment can cause human refractory infections. Sufficient monitoring of environmental AMRB had not been performed regularly, and a less burdensome and more efficient method for monitoring environmental AMRB was needed. Assuming to monitor AMRB in the environment, we selected 910 AMRB isolates using cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin from Vietnamese environmental water samples and subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing. It indicated that Escherichia coli (36.0%), Citrobacter freundii (21.4%), Acinetobacter baumannii (20.6%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.7%) were dominant. Using E. coli as a model, we further analysed AMRB isolates by phylogenetic analysis and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The sequenced full-length fimH of the isolates were plotted with the already published fimH sequences on a phylogenetic tree. Considering phylogeny, 14 E. coli strains were subjected to WGS that indicated not only the number and type of ARGs but also the order of ARGs on the plasmid were confirmed in the analysed E. coli isolates. More importantly, 3 of the 14 strains were bla
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.