ArticleAustralian dental journal2026
The Hidden Dangers of Counterfeit and Replica-Like Endodontic Files: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence.
Article in Australian dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review mapped and critically appraised laboratory evidence on counterfeit and replica-like nickel-titanium endodontic files, evaluating design, metallurgical composition, surface finishing, and mechanical performance to clarify clinical and regulatory implications. Comprehensive searches of major databases and key endodontic journals identified 17 in vitro studies; no clinical studies were found. Counterfeit instruments consistently exhibited design irregularities, surface defects, and altered metallurgical properties that reduced cyclic fatigue resistance and produced unpredictable mechanical behaviour, posing significant patient-safety concerns. Replica-like instruments showed heterogeneous performance, with some matching or rarely exceeding original files in specific tests but others demonstrating inferior flexibility or torsional resistance. Quality-control standards were inconsistent or lacking. These findings demonstrate that deviations in alloy processing, phase transformation, and surface finishing compromise mechanical reliability and highlight the urgent need for stronger regulatory oversight and clinical validation to safeguard practitioners and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.