ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2026
Capability, opportunity and motivation for shared decision-making about valproate as an antiseizure medication treatment for epilepsy in women with pregnancy potential: A qualitative study of patient perspectives.
Article in British journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesValproate is a highly effective antiseizure medication but carries significant teratogenic and neurodevelopmental risks to offspring if used during pregnancy. A shared decision-making (SDM) approach is recommended to guide clinician/patient discussions on valproate suitability for women with pregnancy potential. This study applied the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) theoretical framework to explore barriers and facilitators to SDM in valproate prescribing from the perspectives of women with epilepsy who have pregnancy potential.
designQualitative study using timeline-facilitated semi-structured interviews informed by the COM-B model.
methodTwelve UK-based women 18-50 years (M
resultsParticipants were highly motivated to engage in SDM behaviour but reported limited opportunities. Challenges to COM-B domains included insufficient information exchange, low confidence navigating complex epilepsy/reproductive health care discussions, and tensions navigating valproate risks and benefits within broader contexts of seizure control and reproductive health. Initial prescribing during acute seizure crises may have precluded meaningful collaborative discussion. Valproate prescribing/deprescribing incongruent to reproductive goals often resulted in deep regret and deleterious health outcomes for women (and children exposed to valproate in utero).
conclusionComprehensive SDM when valproate is considered clinically appropriate could support informed, patient-centred decision-making. Equipping clinicians to navigate multifaceted risk/benefit discussions and empowering patients with clear, tailored information can help ensure treatment decisions align with reproductive goals. This study highlights the need to embed SDM in valproate prescribing consultations and throughout treatment duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.