Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420229›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Reframing ageing in place: perspectives from Chinese older people.

Yajing Wang, Nini Kerr, Leah Macaden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Psychometric Properties of the Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire-Short Form (AAQ-SF) in Sri Lanka.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yajing WangSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nini KerrSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Leah MacadenSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. leah.macaden@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs global populations age, the concept of ageing in place (AIP), originally rooted in Western discourse, has gained international attention. However, current interpretations of 'place' often remain limited to physical settings such as home and community. This study explored how older people in urban China understand and experience 'place' in AIP.

methodsUsing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine participants in Changsha, China. Data was analysed following IPA's analytic procedures.

resultsFour key themes emerged: (1) Negotiating between two 'homes', with subthemes: Ageing in my own home, and Near and yet far enough from adult children's homes, (2) Ageing in supportive social networks; (3) Ageing in a digital world; and (4) Not to be 'institutionalised'.

conclusionThis study offers a culturally nuanced understanding of AIP, challenging the notion that 'place' is solely a physical or geographical location. It highlights the significance of social connectedness, emotional security, digital participation, and the desire to avoid institutional care. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners, underscoring the need to design ageing policies and care practices that address not only physical housing but also social networks, digital inclusion, and the relational aspects of institutional care, thereby promoting autonomy, dignity, and well-being.

Indexed as

AgingEast Asian PeopleIndependent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial SupportAgeing in placeChinaInterpretative phenomenological analysisOlder peoplePlaceQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41420229
PMCPMC12831261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.