Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420226›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Engagement in advance care planning: effect of playing the card game Anticip'action in a community setting.

Daniel Molnar, Virginie Metoukam Bauquis, Christine Clavien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel MolnarInstitute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Virginie Metoukam BauquisInstitute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christine ClavienInstitute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. christine.clavien@unige.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe card game Anticip’action was developed to foster Advance Care Planning (ACP) culture in medical and community settings. Available in a mobile (smartphone app) and paper formats, this conversation tool helps users to clarify and express their fears, hopes and life priorities, and to carry out actions in line with them.

aimsThe goals of this study were to evaluate in a community setting, the effect of presenting Anticip’action on attitude towards ACP, self-perceived preparedness in case of a health crisis, and action readiness, as well as to collect users’ evaluation of the game, and their preference to use the game in mobile or paper formats.

methodsParticipants attended a 90-minute public event on the topic of advance directives, received information about ACP, filled questionnaire 1 (Q1), were introduced to the game, filled Q2, took the game home, and returned Q3 6–8 weeks later. Data collection included retention rates; pre-post responses on self-perceived preparedness in case of a health crisis, attitude towards ACP, and readiness to take related actions (analyzed using paired t-test on mean 1–5 Likert scores); proportions of anticipatory actions (planned or done) reported in Q3; average endorsement and perceived impact of the game (uMars, 1–5 Likert scores); proportions of reported intention and actual use of the game.

resultsOf the 124 attendees, 118 (mean age 75) completed Q1 & Q2, and 32 returned Q3. Mean baseline levels of attitude, self-perceived preparedness and readiness were uncommonly high (from 2.87 to 4.56). Discovering the game did not significantly impact these values. However, in Q3 (N = 32), 72% of respondents reported intending to take one or several specific anticipatory actions, and 22% had accomplished at least one since discovering the game. Anticip’action obtained high mean endorsement scores (Q2 = 3.67, Q3 = 3.9) and was evaluated as highly impactful for fostering anticipation (Q2 = 4.19, Q3 = 4.17). At home, participants generally preferred using the paper version.

conclusionsAnticip’action, especially in its paper format, is highly endorsed by a senior population with an existing interest in ACP and appears to effectively support the implementation of anticipatory actions. These findings need to be confirmed in larger and more diverse populations. REGISTRATION: The study was preregistered on the OSF platform ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PN8HS ) on 01.12.2023.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningMobile ApplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude to HealthFemaleGamificationHealth EducationHumansMalePatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesAction readinessAdvance care planningAnticip’actionAnticipationCommunity settingConversation gameEnd of lifeLife priorities

Identifiers

PMID41420226
PMCPMC12831310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.