Trial reportEuropean journal of medical research2025
Evaluation of heparin gel's effects on stage II pressure ulcers: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPressure ulcers are common in critically ill patients and can delay recovery. Heparin improves blood flow and reduces inflammation, which may help wound healing. This study compared an optimized heparin hydrogel with a standard hydrocolloid dressing for treating Stage II pressure ulcers in critically ill patients.
methodsEighteen heparin hydrogel formulations were prepared; eight met key physicochemical and stability criteria, and one optimized 1% formulation based on release profile, stability, and microbiological safety was selected for clinical testing. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the heparin hydrogel or a hydrocolloid dressing every 3 days alongside standard wound care. Wound length, width, and surface area, as well as the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score at baseline and on days 3, 7, and 14 after enrollment.
resultsEighty-four patients were enrolled in the study, and 56 completed the trial (26 in the heparin hydrogel group and 30 in the hydrocolloid control group). The two groups were similar in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Both groups improved wound healing over time, but patients who received the heparin hydrogel had greater reductions in PUSH scores, wound length, width, and surface area by day 14 (p < 0.05). The median healing time was 7 days (95% CI 5.8-8.2) in the heparin group and 10 days (95% CI 8.8-11.2) in the hydrocolloid group (p < 0.001). No local or systemic adverse events were reported during the study.
conclusionsHeparin hydrogel treatment was well-tolerated and effectively accelerated wound recovery in patients with stage II pressure ulcers. Nonetheless, further research is warranted to elucidate the role of heparin hydrogel in pressure ulcer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.