ArticleBMC public health2025
An evaluation of the effects of universal free school meals on secondary school-aged pupils' dietary intakes in England: a natural experiment.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn September 2023, Tower Hamlets implemented a major policy change to Universal Free School Meals (UFSM) extending provision to all secondary school pupils aged 11-16y. There is limited evidence exploring the effects of UFSM in secondary school-aged children, and this, therefore, offered an opportune natural experiment to explore the effects of this policy change. The aims of the project were to explore the effects of UFSM on secondary-school aged pupils' dietary intake and food security.
methodsNatural experiment using a mixed longitudinal cross-sectional design in intervention (n = 3) and control schools (n = 2). Schools purposefully selected Year 8 classes and all pupils were invited to participate using opt-out consent. Pupils completed four non-consecutive weekdays of total dietary intake using Intake24. Dietary outcomes were mean change in key macro- and micronutrients pre-post-UFSM at lunchtime and in total diet. Within-pupil changes were analysed using a linear model that adjusted for gender and included a lunch-type and intervention/control interaction.
resultsDietary data pre- and post- UFSM was captured for 176 pupils (99 intervention, 77 control). Only a small number of pupils in the intervention schools changed lunch-type to take up UFSM (n = 19). Most pupils had a combination of School, Home or Other lunch. Only two of the 18 tests for interaction gave p < 0.05, namely energy and protein intakes at lunchtime. Most pupils were food secure both pre- and post-UFSM in intervention and control schools.
conclusionAlthough we found almost no lunch-type and intervention/control interaction effects on mean change in pupils' dietary intakes, inferences about dietary effectiveness require careful consideration. Reasons include only a small number of pupils took up the UFSM offer, there may be a delay between implementation and take-up, and we do not know how the offer of UFSM was communicated to parents and/or pupils. This study highlights a need for better understanding of reasons for poor take up and whether take up will change over time post policy implementation. Wider challenges pertinent to school food, such as, the quality and availability of food on offer, and the dining environment, remain important considerations to maximise the nutritional benefit of universal free school meal policy changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.