ArticleAnimal cognition2025
Low motivation drives poor performance of infected, anorexic crows on a string-pulling task.
Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is growing concern that infectious disease can impair the cognitive performance of wild animals, but the mechanisms by which this may occur are unclear. Here, we examined the apparent contributions of cognitive and motivational factors to the poor performance on a string-pulling task among American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) infected with a common bacterial pathogen (Campylobacter spp.). In a sample of 57 crows, of which 65% were infected with Campylobacter, we found that infected crows were significantly less likely to solve a string-pulling task with a food reward and took longer to solve it after engaging with the task. However, their poor performance appeared largely motivational. Infected birds exhibited longer latency to attempt the task (9.0 ± 2.8 vs. 22.8 ± 3.4 min when uninfected vs. infected, respectively). They also had a slower attempt rate after initial engagement (lower persistence) than uninfected crows: on average, the attempt rate of infected birds was 61% lower than for uninfected birds. Anorexia may have played a role in this lower motivation, as infected crows consumed significantly fewer calories when food was provided ad libitum than uninfected crows: birds with the highest apparent infection intensity ate 43.4% fewer calories/day than uninfected birds. Our study provides a framework for distinguishing among the potential mechanisms underlying impaired performance on a problem-solving task among infected individuals. It also sheds light on some of the potential downstream fitness and survival consequences for animals exhibiting disease-linked changes in behavior and cognitive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.