Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420129›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2026

Loss of Tooth Structure After Successive Removal of Temporary Restorative Materials by Dental Students Between Endodontic Treatment Sessions: An In Vitro Study.

Márcia Cunha, Andressa Galzer Dos Santos, Roberto Zimmer, Fernanda Zanella Arruda, Guilherme Anziliero Arossi, Fernando Freitas Portella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Márcia CunhaUniversidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil.
Andressa Galzer Dos SantosUniversidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil.
Roberto ZimmerUniversidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4565-4756
Fernanda Zanella ArrudaUniversidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil.
Guilherme Anziliero ArossiUniversity of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-6282
Fernando Freitas PortellaUniversidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3232-001X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the loss of tooth structure after the removal of temporary restorative materials between endodontic treatment sessions performed by undergraduate students.

methodsTwenty human molar teeth underwent endodontic coronal access and were randomly divided into two groups. One group received a temporary restoration with zinc oxide and calcium sulfate-based temporary cement (ZNO) alone, while the other group was restored with a combination of zinc oxide and calcium sulfate-based cement at the base of the restoration, and conventional glass ionomer cement as the outer layer (GIC). Every week, four trained undergraduate dental students performed the coronal reopening of the teeth. The teeth were individually weighed after the coronal access and after each removal of the temporary restoration. This process was carried out for 4 weeks. After the fourth week, two specialists in restorative dentistry fully removed any remaining temporary materials and finished the cavity.

resultsThe average tooth mass variation was calculated at each removal stage. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the variation in tooth mass as a function of the interventions. The final percentage mass variation was -1.946 (±1.096) for the teeth restored with ZNO, and -1.841 (±0.918) for those restored with ZNO + GIC. Every temporary filling removal presented a negative variation in tooth mass of 0.37% for ZNO, and of 0.63% for teeth restored with ZNO + GIC, respectively.

conclusionsSuccessive removals of temporary restorative materials led to loss of dental structure. When comparing temporary restorations made with ZNO + GIC and ZNO, no differences in the lost mass were observed.

Indexed as

Dental Restoration, TemporaryEndodonticsStudents, DentalCalcium SulfateDental CementsGlass Ionomer CementsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMolarZinc OxideCalcium SulfateDental CementsGlass Ionomer CementsZinc Oxideendodontic treatmentglass ionomer cementlinear regressiontemporary restorationzinc oxide

Identifiers

PMID41420129
PMCPMC13383342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.