Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420070›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026

Current gynaecological management of women and girls with bleeding disorders in the United Kingdom: A UKHCDO haemophilia treatment centre survey and evaluation of real-world clinical practice for the British Journal of Haematology.

Laura Knox, Imogen Swart-Rimmer, Naim Rahimi, Callum Harris, Lugain Abdalla, Gary Benson, Clare Brown, Helen Campbell, Ana Carvalhosa, Justin T Clarke and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Laura KnoxDepartment of Haematology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Imogen Swart-RimmerDepartment of Haematology, University Hospitals, Birmingham, UK.
Naim RahimiOxford Haemophilia & Thrombosis Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Callum HarrisOxford Haemophilia & Thrombosis Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Lugain AbdallaSheffield Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre, Sheffield NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Gary BensonNorthern Ireland Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre & Thrombosis Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Clare BrownDepartment of Haematology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Helen CampbellPatient Partner of the UKHCDO Girls and Women's Bleeding Disorders Group, Manchester, UK.
Ana CarvalhosaSouthampton Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Justin T ClarkeDepartment of O&G, University Hospitals, Birmingham, UK.
Sarah GarsideLeeds Children's Hospital and The North and West Yorkshire Haemophilia Network, Leeds, UK.
Claire LentaigneDepartment of Haematology, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Jayna MistryDepartment of Haematology, University Hospitals, Birmingham, UK.
Priyanka RahejaThe Royal London Hospital Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
Cora WarrenCardiff Haemophilia Centre and Bleeding Disorders Network Wales, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Rezan Abdul-KadirDepartment of O&G and Katharine Dormandy Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, The Royal Free NHS Trust and Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2684-1006
Gill LoweDepartment of Haematology, University Hospitals, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2527-9557
Nicola CurryOxford Haemophilia & Thrombosis Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3849-0688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Girls and women with bleeding disorders (GWBD) comprise more than half of all registered patients with bleeding disorders in the UK National Haemophilia Database. The gynaecological care of GWBD, until recently, has not been prioritised despite high health burdens, where four of every five patients experience heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). We report the results of a national survey exploring gynaecological health-care services offered across haemophilia centres in the United Kingdom, with a focus on HMB. We combine these results with a retrospective cohort analysis of individual patient care records, across a 3-year period. Of 65 haemophilia centres, 41 responded, covering 90% of the UK GWBD population. Six hundred and ninety-seven individual patient care records were included, from 13 centres. Our results show that immediate clinical care offered to GWBD experiencing HMB is adequate, despite infrastructure deficiencies (such as lack of joint-gynaecology input and few centres having named clinical leads for GWBD). We recommend several areas for immediate prioritisation within haemophilia centres which will improve the equity of care for GWBD. These include direct access to gynaecological services; universal testing of iron status; and more broadly, a shift towards clinical practices that recognise and address the impact HMB has on patients' psycho-social, sexual and overall quality of life.

Indexed as

GynecologyHemophilia AMenorrhagiaAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomYoung Adultgynaecological careheavy menstrual bleedinginherited bleeding disorders

Identifiers

PMID41420070
PMCPMC12916183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.