Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420052›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Cultural differences in spatial frequency tunings to faces do not generalize to visual scenes and object stimuli.

Francis Gingras, Daniel Fiset, Marie-Pier Plouffe-Demers, Amanda Estéphan, Michael N'Guiamba, Dan Sun, Ye Zhang, Caroline Blais

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francis GingrasDépartement de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, CP 1250, Succ. Hull, Gatineau, J8X 3X7, Canada.
Daniel FisetDépartement de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, CP 1250, Succ. Hull, Gatineau, J8X 3X7, Canada.
Marie-Pier Plouffe-DemersDépartement de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, CP 1250, Succ. Hull, Gatineau, J8X 3X7, Canada.
Amanda EstéphanDépartement de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, CP 1250, Succ. Hull, Gatineau, J8X 3X7, Canada.
Michael N'GuiambaDépartement de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, CP 1250, Succ. Hull, Gatineau, J8X 3X7, Canada.
Dan SunDépartement de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, CP 1250, Succ. Hull, Gatineau, J8X 3X7, Canada.
Ye ZhangDépartement de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, CP 1250, Succ. Hull, Gatineau, J8X 3X7, Canada.
Caroline BlaisDépartement de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, CP 1250, Succ. Hull, Gatineau, J8X 3X7, Canada. caroline.blais@uqo.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has identified cultural differences in visual perception, where East Asians focus more on global object structure and display a larger breadth of attention compared with Westerners. East Asians rely on lower spatial frequencies (SFs) compared to Westerners for face recognition, which may be linked to this. Investigating whether such differences extend to other high-level stimulus categories would clarify if SF tuning differences reflect more general or face specific cognitive processes. The present study compared the SF tunings of Canadians and Chinese during object (Exp. 1; N = 50) and scene (Exp. 3; N = 47) categorization. In both experiments, results did not indicate a significant difference between groups. In Experiment 3 (N = 128), we conducted an online replication of Experiment 1 while measuring the SF tunings of the same participants during face perception. Again, no significant difference between the groups was found during object categorization, but the finding that East Asians rely on lower SF than Westerners was replicated. Together, these results suggest that unique mechanisms may underlie the cultural differences in face processing, though alternative explanations, such as the feature consistency of faces, could also account for these findings.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonFacial RecognitionPattern Recognition, VisualSpace PerceptionAdolescentAdultCanadaChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleWhite PeopleYoung AdultCross-cultural psychologyFace processingObject processingScene processingSpatial frequenciesVisual perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.