Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419963›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025

Enhanced prediction of cholecystectomy using obesity-modified TyG indices: a machine learning and SHAP-based study.

Yue Zhang, Ruifeng Duan, Xin Chen, Lijuan Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Ruifeng DuanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Lijuan WeiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China. 1835529876@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigates the association between TyG-related composite indices and the risk of gallstones and the history of cholecystectomy, using logistic regression and machine learning models to evaluate predictive performance and clinical utility. Additionally, the study explores the relationship between TyG-derived obesity indices and the age at the history of cholecystectomy.

methodsA total of 3737 participants were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between TyG, TyG.BMI, TyG.WC, and TyG.WHtR with gallstone prevalence and the history of cholecystectomy. Performance metrics for 11 machine learning models, including XGB, logistic regression (LR), and gradient boosting machine (GBM), were evaluated using AUC-ROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration plots, and SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) analysis were used to assess clinical utility and interpretability. Additionally, De Long test was applied to compare the AUC-ROC values of the machine learning models to identify statistically significant differences.

resultsAmong 3737 participants, 395 (10.6%) had gallstones. Individuals with gallstones were older (median 59 vs. 51 years, P < 0.01), predominantly female, and had higher levels of TyG and TyG-related indices (all P < 0.01). Logistic regression analyses revealed that while TyG was not significantly associated with gallstones after full adjustment, composite indices incorporating obesity measures-TyG.BMI, TyG.WC, and TyG.WHtR-remained robustly associated with gallstone risk in the fully adjusted model. Participants in the highest quartile (Q4) of these indices had higher odds of gallstones compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1). Further analysis revealed that TyG.BMI, TyG.WC, and TyG.WHtR were associated with younger age at the history of cholecystectomy, with threshold effects identified at TyG-BMI = 184.35 and TyG-WC = 776.69, above which the association with younger cholecystectomy age became significant. In predicting the history of cholecystectomy, XGB outperformed other models with an AUC-ROC of 0.83, accuracy of 0.89, and F1-score of 0.73, showing balanced sensitivity (0.72) and specificity (0.82). The De Long test indicated that XGB demonstrated statistically significant superior performance compared to all other models (P < 0.01 for pairwise comparisons), reaffirming its high predictive capability. Supplementary Fig. 2 presents ROC curves for all models, where XGB achieved the highest AUC-ROC (0.827), outperforming other models such as LR (AUC-ROC = 0.746) and GBM (AUC-ROC = 0.742).

conclusionsTyG-derived composite indices, particularly TyG.WHtR, are strong predictors of both gallstone prevalence and the history of cholecystectomy. The XGB model demonstrated the best performance in predicting cholecystectomy risk, with the De Long test confirming its superior AUC-ROC compared to other models. The combination of strong predictive performance, good calibration, and high interpretability makes XGB a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in managing gallbladder disease risk.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyGallstonesMachine LearningObesityAdultAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsROC CurveBody mass index (TyG.BMI)GallstoneHeight ratio (TyG.WHtR)Triglyceride-glucose indexTriglyceride-glucose index (TyG)WaistWaist circumference (TyG.WC)

Identifiers

PMID41419963
PMCPMC12831327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.