ArticleBMC health services research2025
Bridging individual and population perspectives: a qualitative inquiry into health activation with population health experts.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preliminary Field-Note Observations on Referral Uptake Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Qualitative Pilot Study in Tarrant County, Texas.Health services insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPopulation health activation is thought to extend beyond individual patient engagement, emphasising community-wide participation in health management. This contrasts with the original patient activation measure developed by Hibbard and colleagues in 2010. This qualitative study thus investigates how population health experts conceptualise health activation on a population level.
methodsAdopting a critical realist epistemology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts from health policy, health care systems, and community health across various institutions in Singapore. Purposive sampling was used to recruit experts with over five years of relevant experience. Interviews, lasting approximately 60 min each, were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke's framework.
resultsA total of 18 population health experts were interviewed. No new ideas or concepts emerged after the 15th interview; an additional three interviews were conducted to ensure saturation. Based on the findings, three major themes were generated: (1) Health activation is dynamic and influenced by external life circumstances such as competing responsibilities; (2) Emotional readiness and psychological resilience are critical prerequisites for meaningful health activation, beyond mere knowledge or skills; and (3) Social support networks and health care system structures are important in enabling or inhibiting health activation. Based on these insights, we propose a preliminary conceptual framework for health activation interventions that integrates emotional, social, and systemic dimensions.
conclusionIn summary, the findings advance the understanding of population health activation by proposing a broader and more dynamic conceptualisation, and they highlight the need for flexible adaptable strategies in population health, where engagement must be maintained over time and across diverse subpopulations. By focusing on emotional resilience, psychological preparedness and external support structures, health care systems can better promote and sustain individual health activation. Future research should empirically test this and incorporate additional perspectives from the public and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.