ArticleBMC medical education2025
Undergraduate health sciences students' perceptions and practices of evidence-based practice: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) is vital for clinical professionals, including physicians, physiotherapists, nurses, dentists, and psychiatrists from diverse cultural backgrounds. EBP ensures the implementation of systematic, standardized, safe, and cost-effective interventions. While existing Saudi literature has primarily focused on current practitioners, exploring the perspectives of local healthcare students regarding EBP is essential.
methodsA descriptive survey with cross-sectional data collection was conducted online using the Arabic version of the Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (S-EBPQ) with 132 Saudi undergraduate students in the health sciences. Descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, and linear regression were used for data analysis.
resultsThe results indicate that undergraduate health sciences students viewed EBP positively, with the attitude subscale being the highest (mean = 5.32), and the practice subscale being the lowest (mean = 4.89). The multiple linear regression analysis revealed no significant differences due to demographic characteristics (gender, age, study year, and marital status). Retrieving and reviewing the evidence on the EBP practice revealed a significant positive effect (t = 3.537, P < 0.001, along with a significant positive effect of sharing and applying EBP (t = 2.255, P = 0.026) on the EBP practice. However, there was no significant effect of attitude toward EBP on the EBP practice (P = 0.921).
conclusionThis study revealed that significant levels of EBP exist among health sciences undergraduates; however, the outcomes showed that practice scores were less than attitude scores. While theoretical knowledge is strong, opportunities exist for improvement in critical analysis and application to specific cases. Moreover, educators can enhance proficiency through interactive learning experiences and practical workshops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.