Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419866›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Medication reconciliation in clinical practice: a survey of knowledge, attitude, and practices among Egyptian healthcare providers.

Aya M AbdelMagid, Nirmeen A Sabry, Ahmed Abuelhana, Aaron Courtenay, Amani M Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aya M AbdelMagidClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El-Aini St., Giza, P.O. Box: 11562, Egypt. aya.abdelmagid@pharma.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6175-1690
Nirmeen A SabryClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El-Aini St., Giza, P.O. Box: 11562, Egypt.
Ahmed AbuelhanaClinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice Department, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Aaron CourtenayClinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice Department, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Amani M AliClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El-Aini St., Giza, P.O. Box: 11562, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6155-2819

Funding

Department for Education (DfE) International Science Partnership Fund (ISPF), Ulster University, Coleraine, UK Project ID: 681136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients are at significant risk of harm from unintended medication errors, which remain prevalent and often preventable in healthcare systems, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Medication reconciliation (MedRec) plays a critical role in minimizing these errors by ensuring an accurate and complete medication list throughout patient transitions in the healthcare system.

aimThis study aimed to assess the current status of the MedRec process in Egypt by exploring the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of physicians and pharmacists as key stakeholders in its implementation.

methodsThis descriptive, cross-sectional study used a structured, validated, self-administered online questionnaire targeting Egyptian physicians and pharmacists. The questionnaire was distributed via snowball sampling through professional networks and social media. Branching logic was used to tailor questions based on respondents’ familiarity with MedRec and hospital-based practices. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the responses, while Chi-square and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to assess group differences.

resultsAmong 272 respondents (182 pharmacists, 90 physicians), representing multiple Egyptian governorates and healthcare sectors (public, private, and military). Among them, 66.9% reported familiarity with MedRec, significantly higher among pharmacists (73.1% vs. 54.4%; p = 0.002). Most respondents (70.2%) rated MedRec as “very valuable” for patient safety, and both groups expressed strong responsibility for its core tasks. Among the 136 hospital-based respondents familiar with MedRec, 79.4% reported institutional implementation. Physicians were more likely than pharmacists to ask patients for their current medication lists (93.8% vs. 76.1%; p = 0.021). Sources of medication history included patient lists or physician documents (74.3%), family interviews (74.3%), medication boxes from home (59.56%), discharge orders (52.2%), and transfer orders from other facilities (33.8%).

conclusionContinuous education and training programs are required to close knowledge gaps, strengthen MedRec practices, and promote a culture of patient safety in Egypt.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationPharmacistsPhysiciansAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEgyptFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthcare providersMedication errorMedication reconciliationPatient safetyPharmacistsPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID41419866
PMCPMC12831293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.