Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419862›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2025

Prevalence of white matter hyperintensities and radiological cerebral small vessel disease: an insight from routinely collected data.

Mark P Maskery, Nicola Rennie, Sachin Mathur, Jo Knight, Hedley C A Emsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark P MaskeryLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. M.Maskery@lancaster.ac.uk.
Nicola RennieLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Sachin MathurDepartment of Neuroradiology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Jo KnightLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Hedley C A EmsleyLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 900,000 MRI brain scans are performed annually in the United Kingdom alone, with incidental findings frequently encountered. One of the most prevalent findings is white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). WMHs often indicate cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) but can also be associated with migraine and demyelination. Prospective population studies have already confirmed a high prevalence of WMHs in elderly patients. In younger patients, or when the radiological burden is low, WMHs are commonly considered non-specific. Routinely collected data represents a valuable resource to facilitate further study. We aimed to describe the prevalence of WMHs in a direct to scan referral population and to understand associations with age, demographics, performance status and referral criteria.

methodsWe performed a service evaluation of our local two-week wait suspected central nervous system cancer pathway to understand the association between age, demographics, performance status, referral criteria, imaging outcomes and both the prevalence and radiological characteristics of WMHs. Analysis was performed using R version 4.1.3.

resultsWe identified 1033 patients, referred over a 30-month period. Mean patient age was 51.3±18.3 years with 65% females. As expected, WMHs were present on 89.7% of scans in patients aged over 80, with 98.1% of these consistent with cSVD upon review by an experienced neuroradiologist. We show an important association between WMHs deemed representative of cSVD and both performance status and levels of deprivation. However, WMHs were also present in approximately 1 in 5 patients under 50 years old and were typically deemed non-specific. Our analysis showed prevalence of WMH, its radiological burden and likelihood of WMHs being attributed to cSVD all increased with age. It is therefore feasible to consider that these changes may represent early cSVD.

conclusionsWe demonstrate a prevalence of radiological cSVD comparable to the wider literature in elderly patients whilst highlighting the potential underestimation of cSVD in the younger population, in whom further study of WMHs is required. There is potential for routinely collected data to define the prevalence and characteristics of radiological cSVD more accurately whilst facilitating further research.

Indexed as

Cerebral Small Vessel DiseasesWhite MatterAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceMagnetic resonance imagingSmall vessel diseaseStroke

Identifiers

PMID41419862
PMCPMC12831340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.