ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Standardized vaccination practices for preterm infants: Egyptian experts' consensus.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreterm birth has become increasingly common over the past several decades. The underdeveloped immune systems place preterm infants at an increased risk of infections, often vaccine-preventable, compared to full-term infants. Despite the importance of immunizing preterm infants, research on vaccine safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness in this population remains limited. This consensus article seeks to provide clear, evidence-based recommendations to improve vaccine coverage and timely immunization in preterm infants in Egypt.
methodsA modified Delphi consensus approach was employed to develop evidence-based recommendations for preterm infant vaccination in Egypt. A panel of 18 experts, including pediatricians, neonatologists, and a pharmacist participated. The process covered 15 key vaccination topics, with 59 statements formulated based on a comprehensive literature review. A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate the statements, with ≥ 70% agreement threshold for consensus. Statements not meeting this threshold were revised and subjected to a second voting round. Final recommendations were established based on the achieved consensus.
resultsOur consensus included 59 statements. In the first round of voting, 63 statements were evaluated, with the panel reaching a consensus on 54 statements. Nine statements fell below the 70% agreement threshold and required a second round of voting. A second round was conducted, including these nine statements along with one newly added statement. Ultimately, five statements achieved consensus, while five were removed.
conclusionEstablishing preterm vaccination guidelines is important for reducing mortality and morbidity in this high-risk population, especially in Egypt. This consensus emphasizes the need for timely immunization to minimize the risk of infections associated with delayed vaccination. Additionally, it identifies several areas requiring further research, ensuring that future updates can continue to refine and enhance immunization strategies for preterm infants. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.