ArticleBMC public health2025
Modeling ROI in chronic disease management: a simulation-based framework integrating patient adherence and policy timing.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Health as Entry to Improve Population Health-Research Implications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improving Outcomes for Black Adults with Diabetes: The Power of Peer Support in the Multidisciplinary Care Team.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic diseases impose a sustained burden on healthcare systems through progressive deterioration and long-term costs. Although adherence-enhancing interventions are widely promoted, their return on investment (ROI) remains uncertain, particularly under heterogeneous patient behavior and socioeconomic variation.
methodsWe developed a simulation-based framework integrating disease progression, time-varying adherence, and policy timing. Cumulative healthcare costs were modeled over a 10-year horizon using continuous-time stochastic formulations calibrated with Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data stratified by income. ROI was estimated across adherence gains (δ) and policy costs (γ).
resultsEarly and adaptive interventions yielded the highest ROI by sustaining adherence and slowing progression. ROI exceeded 20% when [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], whereas low-impact or high-cost policies failed to break even. Subgroup analyses showed a 32% ROI gap between the lowest and highest income strata, with projected savings of $312 per patient versus baseline. Sensitivity tests confirmed robustness under stochastic adherence and inflation variability.
conclusionsThe framework offers a transparent, adaptable tool for evaluating cost-effective adherence strategies. By linking behavioral effectiveness with fiscal feasibility, it supports design of robust and equitable chronic disease policies. Reported ROI values represent conservative lower bounds, and extensions incorporating DALYs and QALYs illustrate scalability toward health outcome integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.