ArticleBMC cancer2025
Impact of bilateral surgery on time to treatment in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy - a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIt is unclear whether patients with breast cancer (BC) who undergo mastectomy experience delays in adjuvant treatment when bilateral surgery is performed. This study was conducted with the objective of addressing this knowledge gap.
methodsStage 0-III BC patients who underwent mastectomy (including conventional mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy [NSM], and skin-sparing mastectomy [SSM]) at a Swiss university hospital between 01/2013 and 12/2023 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to detect predictors of time to adjuvant treatment.
resultsA total of 394 patients were included, 308 (78.2%) of whom underwent unilateral mastectomy (UM) and 86 (21.8%) of whom underwent bilateral mastectomy (BM). Compared with patients who underwent UM, those who underwent BM were younger (median age [years] 49 vs. 60), more likely to carry a pathogenic germline BRCA variant (28.7% vs. 2.6%), presented with bilateral breast cancer (14.9% vs. 0%), and underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (34.5% vs. 12.4%). Patients who underwent BM were more likely to receive NSM or SSM (81.4% vs. 52.9%) and to develop wound healing disorders (20.7% vs. 11.4%). On univariable analysis, no differences in time to any adjuvant treatment were observed between BMs and UMs (median [days] 34 vs. 33; p = 0.444). Multivariable analysis suggested that bilateral mastectomy was associated with a shorter time to adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.15-5.58). Short-term postoperative complications were associated with prolonged time to any adjuvant treatment (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.36-0.71) and time to adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.79).
conclusionUndergoing BM did not result in a delay in time to adjuvant treatment in comparison to UM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.