Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419847›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Interventions to improve faculty well-being in medical schools: a scoping review.

Duygu Demirbas Keskin, Demet Koc, Kaan Mert Guven, Haldun Akoglu, Levent Altintas, Melike Sahiner

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Duygu Demirbas KeskinMedical Education PhD. Program, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey. drduydemir@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4162-2442
Demet KocMedical Education PhD. Program, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4109-6793
Kaan Mert GuvenDepartment of Medical Education, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8920-5081
Haldun AkogluMedical Education PhD. Program, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1316-0308
Levent AltintasDepartment of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4950-6956
Melike SahinerDepartment of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey. melike.sahiner@acibadem.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6561-7675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical school faculty play a crucial role in education, research, and clinical care. However, they encounter increasing challenges such as excessive workloads, growing administrative responsibilities, and insufficient institutional support. These stressors intensify the risk of burnout and negatively affect their overall well-being. Despite the increased awareness of faculty well-being, interventions addressing the needs of medical school faculty remain fragmented. This scoping review aims to systematically map the existing interventions that support the faculty's well-being.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted up to November 2025. Studies were included if they reported faculty-focused well-being interventions with quantitative pre-post outcomes using psychological measures. Data extraction and analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and interventions were thematically categorized by implementation focus.

resultsWe screened 8135 abstracts, reviewed 429 full-text reports, and included 13 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Interventions were classified into four categories: (1) individual level (e.g., mindfulness training, digital gratitude exercises), (2) peer/group based (e.g., mentoring, reflection groups), (3) organizational level (e.g., leadership programs, schedule changes), and (4) multimodal strategies that integrate individual and institutional components. Numerous studies have indicated decreases in burnout and stress, as well as improvement in well-being. However, significant variation in study design, outcome measures, and duration limited the study's comparability.

conclusionsInterventions to support faculty well-being in medical schools are diverse and generally beneficial. The multilevel and organizational-level approaches show the strongest potential. Medical schools need to emphasize multilevel organizational reforms-concentrating on workload, recognition, and leadership accountability-while integrating individual-level supports to foster sustainable improvements in faculty well-being. Future studies should adopt standardized outcome measures and longitudinal designs to better evaluate sustainability and impact. This scoping review evaluates existing evidence on intervention strategies designed to improve faculty well-being in medical schools while identifying significant research gaps and future directions. Although this study focused on medical school faculty, it may also provide insights relevant to broader well-being initiatives within health professions education.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalFaculty, MedicalSchools, MedicalHumansLeadershipAcademic medicineFacultyFaculty membersInterventionsMedical schoolsWell-being

Identifiers

PMID41419847
PMCPMC12831393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.