ArticleBMC medical education2025
Interventions to improve faculty well-being in medical schools: a scoping review.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical school faculty play a crucial role in education, research, and clinical care. However, they encounter increasing challenges such as excessive workloads, growing administrative responsibilities, and insufficient institutional support. These stressors intensify the risk of burnout and negatively affect their overall well-being. Despite the increased awareness of faculty well-being, interventions addressing the needs of medical school faculty remain fragmented. This scoping review aims to systematically map the existing interventions that support the faculty's well-being.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted up to November 2025. Studies were included if they reported faculty-focused well-being interventions with quantitative pre-post outcomes using psychological measures. Data extraction and analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and interventions were thematically categorized by implementation focus.
resultsWe screened 8135 abstracts, reviewed 429 full-text reports, and included 13 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Interventions were classified into four categories: (1) individual level (e.g., mindfulness training, digital gratitude exercises), (2) peer/group based (e.g., mentoring, reflection groups), (3) organizational level (e.g., leadership programs, schedule changes), and (4) multimodal strategies that integrate individual and institutional components. Numerous studies have indicated decreases in burnout and stress, as well as improvement in well-being. However, significant variation in study design, outcome measures, and duration limited the study's comparability.
conclusionsInterventions to support faculty well-being in medical schools are diverse and generally beneficial. The multilevel and organizational-level approaches show the strongest potential. Medical schools need to emphasize multilevel organizational reforms-concentrating on workload, recognition, and leadership accountability-while integrating individual-level supports to foster sustainable improvements in faculty well-being. Future studies should adopt standardized outcome measures and longitudinal designs to better evaluate sustainability and impact. This scoping review evaluates existing evidence on intervention strategies designed to improve faculty well-being in medical schools while identifying significant research gaps and future directions. Although this study focused on medical school faculty, it may also provide insights relevant to broader well-being initiatives within health professions education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.