Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419811›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A scalable data driven geospatial framework for climate risk assessment.

Moustafa Naiem Abdel-Mooty, Paulin Coulibaly, Wael El-Dakhakhni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Moustafa Naiem Abdel-MootyDepartment of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L7, Canada. abdelmom@mcmaster.ca.
Paulin CoulibalyNSERC FloodNet, Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L7, Canada.
Wael El-DakhakhniDepartment of Civil Engineering and School of Computational Science and Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional flood risk management approaches often rely on historical data, limiting their ability to account for the increasing severity and frequency of climate-induced hazards. This study presents a scalable, data-driven framework that integrates geospatial analysis and machine learning to dynamically assess climate risks. The framework enables decision-makers to identify vulnerabilities, quantify flood risk under evolving climate scenarios, and develop informed adaptation strategies. Using bias-corrected CMIP5 climate projections as use case, the framework is demonstrated through a case study in Texas, where community flood risk prediction is done under multiple emission scenarios. Results indicate that under RCP 8.5, community vulnerability is projected to increase by 14%, leading to an estimated 28% rise in economic damages ($1.8B per decade by 2050) and heightened socio-economic disruptions, including displacement and infrastructure failures. By identifying the most influential climatological factors that impact community resilience, our approach stresses the urgent need for global action to mitigate extreme climate scenarios. It shows the scalability and flexibility of the framework, emphasizing its potential as decision-support tool, and a step towards a digital twin system for climate risk assessment and adaptation planning.

Indexed as

Climate AdaptationClimate impactClimate riskDigital twinFlood hazardInterpretabilityMachine learningResilience

Identifiers

PMID41419811
PMCPMC12820248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.