ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Self-pollinated cannabis seeds lead to less variation in shape: a technological approach of potential commercial interest.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe breeding process enables plants to inherit desirable traits, such as yield, flowering time, pest resistance, and cannabinoid and/or terpene content. As a result of these intensive genetic improvement practices, where genetically similar individuals or those from the same lineage are crossed, the expression of unfavorable recessive alleles may occur due to homozygosity. This can lead to less productive plants, increased susceptibility to diseases, and reduced quality. Despite the potential negative effects associated with inbreeding, self-pollination (a form of inbreeding) is a necessary cultivation technique used to obtain seeds that produce phenotypically female plants (feminized seeds) for commercialization and/or to fix desirable traits, albeit at the cost of reduced genetic variability. The Cannabis sativa L. seed market has grown significantly in recent decades, driven by the legalization and regulation of medicinal and recreational use. Self-pollinated feminized seeds are popular among growers and commercial seed banks because, in most cases, they guarantee that inflorescences will express the cannabinoid and terpene profile of the single parent plant. The objective of this work is to compare the morphological variation of seeds obtained from the reversal of female clones followed by self-pollination, and seeds obtained from crossing genetically distinct parental. To study seed shape and size, we employed 2D geometric morphometrics (GM) based on landmarks and semilandmarks, coupled with a supervised machine learning approach and multivariate statistical approach for analysis.
resultsNo direct relationship was observed between size and seed type, although significant differences between varieties were detected. The shape of seeds from crosses between different parents (male and female) showed lower classification accuracy compared to feminized seeds. These results support the hypothesis that inbreeding reduces the variability, as feminized seeds from self-pollination were correctly identified at a high rate using a discriminant function.
conclusionsOur research demonstrates that 2D geometric morphometrics can effectively distinguish and trace feminized and self-pollinated cannabis seeds. These seeds exhibit the least morphological variation, enabling accurate identification and providing a reliable foundation for practical applications. The Random Forest classifier's high performance confirms the effectiveness of using morphological traits for seed discrimination. These results open the door for advanced machine-learning techniques aimed to improve scalability and automation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.