ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based prediction of well performance parameters for wellhead choke flow optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate measurement and forecast of fluid flow rates in production wells are important to the estimation of hydrocarbon recovery, attainment of stable and controllable flow regimes, and optimization of production plans. Wellhead chokes, or pressure control valves, find widespread use in the hydrocarbon industry for two major reasons: provision of a stable downstream pressure and creation of the necessary backpressure for balancing gas well productivity and controlling in-well pressure drops. Over the past fifty years, numerous multiphase flow models and empirical correlations have been developed to estimate flow rates under a wide range of fluid properties, flow regimes, and pressure drop conditions. None of these models is deemed to be globally applicable to every region because each has inherent measurement errors that limit the accuracy of predictions for well performance parameters. In this study, three machine learning algorithms-Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN)-were employed to predict well performance parameters. The dataset consisted of 182 samples for each of the five input parameters-liquid production rate (QL), wellhead pressure (Pwh), choke size (D64), basic sediment and water content (BS&W), and gas-liquid ratio (GLR)-resulting in a total of 910 data points. Among the tested models, MLP demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.