ArticleScientific reports2025
MapReduce-based deep learning framework for potato leaf disease detection in sustainable precision agriculture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sustainable precision agriculture has become increasingly vital for enhancing crop productivity, minimizing environmental impact, and ensuring global food security. Potato leaf diseases, such as blight, pose significant threats to crop yield. The accurate and timely detection of potato leaf diseases is critical for minimizing yield losses. This study proposes a pair a lightweight MobileNetV3 classifier with a MapReduce-style data pipeline that parallelizes preprocessing and batch inference across nodes. The model utilizes a dataset comprising 2152 images categorized into three classes. The preprocessing pipeline includes image resizing, normalization, and data augmentation to enhance model generalization. MobileNetV3 is employed for high-level feature extraction and classification, while MapReduce enables parallel processing and efficient handling of large datasets. The experimental results achieved a detection accuracy of 98.6% across the training phase, 96.9% in the validation phase, and 96.8% in the testing phase, and testing sensitivity (95.3%), Specificity (97.7%), and F1-Score (96.4%) While training for this dataset is performed on GPU, the MapReduce pipeline makes the system horizontally extensible for larger deployments and continuous image ingest. We report per-class confusion matrices and standard clinical metrics, and analyze when MapReduce provides throughput gains versus a single-node baseline. The proposed model significantly outperforms several state-of-the-art methods, as validated through statistical measures such as sensitivity, specificity, and misclassification rate. Its high accuracy, scalability, and robustness make it suitable for large-scale agricultural disease monitoring and precision farming applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.