ArticleScientific data2025
Harmonized geospatial data to evaluate the Electric Distribution Networks in the US Northeast.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable, open-access data on electric distribution networks is crucial for advancing energy equity, enhancing infrastructure resilience, and informing policy evaluation. In this work, we present a harmonized geospatial dataset for the electric distribution networks in the US Northeast, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont. The dataset integrates technical, spatial, and topological data extracted from utility hosting capacity maps (public GIS layers reporting feeder-level estimates of distributed energy resources) and processed using a reproducible pipeline. Our network comprises 3,884,698 line segments, achieving a population coverage of 72.46% and geographic coverage of 84.96%. By bridging complex network theory with spatial infrastructure mapping, this dataset enables a multidimensional assessment of electric grid performance, sustainability, and equity. It allows researchers and policymakers to explore the links between urban and economic development patterns, network morphology, and energy outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.