Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419721›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Presenting the Signers' Eye-movements in English Reading (SEER) Corpus: An eye-tracking dataset of reading behaviors by deaf early signers and hearing non-signers.

Frances G Cooley, Karen Emmorey, Emily Saunders, Elizabeth R Schotter

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frances G CooleyDepartment of Liberal Studies, NTID, Rochester Institute of Technology, 52 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA. fgcdls@rit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5074-177X
Karen EmmoreySchool of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5647-0066
Emily SaundersWheelock College of Education and Human Development, Boston University, 2 Silber Way, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-1552
Elizabeth R SchotterDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9345-1051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye-tracking corpora have advanced our understanding of reading processes by providing large-scale datasets of naturalistic reading behavior. However, existing corpora have almost exclusively sampled from typically hearing readers of spoken languages. Here, we present the Signers' Eye-movements in English Reading (SEER) Corpus, a dataset of eye-movement behaviors from 41 skilled deaf adult readers who are early signers of American Sign Language (ASL), as well as a comparative group of 101 typically hearing monolingual English readers. Participants read 200 English sentences presented one at a time. In addition to eye-tracking data, the corpus includes detailed participant information: a standardized measure of reading proficiency, spelling recognition, and nonverbal intelligence for all participants. Information for the deaf participants include ASL comprehension scores, age of ASL acquisition, and phonological awareness scores (for a subset of participants). We report comparative analyses of reading behaviors at both the word level and sentence level. We also examine group differences in the effects of word length, frequency, and surprisal on local measures. The results indicate stronger effects of length and surprisal, but equivalent frequency effects (on content words) for deaf compared to hearing readers. The SEER Corpus offers researchers the opportunity to test hypotheses about reading development and efficiency in bimodal bilinguals who are first language users of ASL and skilled readers of English, supporting broader investigations of visual language processing. The corpus is preregistered and publicly available ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7P4F2 ) to facilitate replication, cross-study comparisons, and exploration of preliminary hypotheses in this understudied population.

Indexed as

DeafnessEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyReadingSign LanguageAdolescentAdultComprehensionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBilingualismCorpusDeafnessEye-trackingReading

Identifiers

PMID41419721
PMCPMC12717185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.