ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Impact of intracranial pressure and related parameters on prognosis in patients undergoing surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Invasive Monitoring of Cerebral Autoregulation in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid and Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to clarify the prognostic significance of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) who underwent surgical treatment. Specifically, we analyzed clinical demographic data and ICP-related parameters (e.g., optimal cerebral perfusion pressure [CPPopt], ΔCPP) to identify key prognostic indicators, with the ultimate goal of providing evidence to guide and optimize postoperative management strategies for this patient population.
designRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
settingNeurosciences critical care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: A prospective cohort of 15 aSAH patients undergoing multiparameter monitoring (April 2024–January 2025) and a retrospective cohort of 45 surgically treated aSAH patients (2022–2024) were included.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsDemographic data, ICP monitoring results, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores were collected from all patients at one month postoperatively. The absolute difference between the optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt) and the 15-min mean cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was defined as ΔCPP. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their GOS scores: the favorable prognosis group (GOS 4–5) and the poor prognosis group (GOS 1–3). Subsequently, statistical analysis was performed to explore the associations between prognostic outcomes and both demographic data (e.g., gender, age, surgical approaches) and monitoring parameters (e.g., pressure reactivity index [PRx], pressure reactivity slope [RAP], ICP, ΔCPP). A retrospective cohort of 52 patients with aSAH — treated at the Second Hospital of the University of South China between 2022 and 2024 — was matched with a prospective cohort at a 1:3 ratio using propensity score matching (conducted via R software). After matching, 45 patients from the prospective cohort were retained as controls. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the retrospective (test) group and the prospective (control) group, and the distributions of prognostic outcomes were compared between the two groups. Elevated initial ICP was a strong predictor of poor prognosis (41.33 ± 10.23 vs. 25.89 ± 10.42 mm Hg, p = 0.014). In patients with ICP ≥ 25 mm Hg, decompressive craniectomy (DC) was associated with a trend toward improved outcomes (Relative Risk [RR] ≈4.8, p = 0.08). The poor-outcome group exhibited a greater mean ΔCPP compared with the favorable-outcome group (12.88 vs. 10.61, p = 0.033). Hypoperfusion (i.e., cerebral perfusion pressure [CPP] < optimal CPP [CPPopt]) was significantly associated with adverse outcomes (p = 0.038). In contrast, hyperperfusion (i.e., CPP > CPPopt) was not significantly associated with harm (p = 0.084). Furthermore, patients who underwent ICP monitoring had a higher favorable prognosis rate than those without monitoring (60% vs. 31.1%, p = 0.046).
conclusionsFirst, in the clinical management of aSAH patients, ICP monitoring plays a pivotal role: it not only facilitates surgical decision-making (e.g., selection of decompressive craniectomy) but also optimizes postoperative hemodynamic management strategies tailored to individual patients. Second, two key factors were identified to predict poor prognosis in aSAH patients: one is the deviation from postoperative CPPopt, among which hypoperfusion is a particularly impactful subtype; the other is elevated initial ICP. Furthermore, this study confirmed that management guided by multiparameter monitoring significantly improves short-term clinical outcomes in aSAH patients, providing practical evidence for the optimized clinical management of this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.