Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419640›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026

Integrating lymphovascular invasion and ypTNM staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery: a multi-institutional analysis.

Shiliang Liu, Yujin Xu, Xufeng Guo, Wencheng Zhang, Geng Wang, Gang Zhao, Yihong Ling, Ruiqi Wang, Li Zhang, Baoqing Chen and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shiliang Liu *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5830-5171
Yujin Xu *Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Xufeng Guo *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wencheng Zhang *Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3730-5361
Geng Wang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Gang ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Yihong LingState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Ruiqi WangDepartment of Thoracic Radiotherapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Li ZhangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Baoqing ChenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9807-7425
Qiaoqiao LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6299-4966
Hong YangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6007-9086
Mian XiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China. ximian@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8088-0970

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) No.82172669; 82373214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence on the prognostic and staging effects of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is limited. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of LVI and develop a modified post-neoadjuvant pathologic staging (ypStage) system integrating LVI and ypTNM stage to improve risk stratification.

methodsThis multi-institutional study included patients with ESCC receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and R0 resection. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted to derive prognostic groupings. A modified ypStage system was developed, validated, and compared with ypTNM stage.

resultsA total of 931 patients were divided into training (n = 565) and external validation (n = 366) cohorts. LVI was present in 115 patients (12.4%). LVI was an independent predictor of survival and disease recurrence, with hazard ratios of 1.70 for overall survival and 1.74 for recurrence-free survival. By integrating LVI status and ypTNM stage, nonmetastatic ESCC were classified into three stages with distinct prognoses. The proposed RPA stage provided superior hazard consistency, hazard discrimination, sample size balance, and outcome prediction over ypTNM stage.

conclusionsLVI was a strong prognostic factor, independent of the current ypTNM stage in ESCC. We developed an RPA-based ypStage system integrating LVI status and ypTNM stage that exhibited good prognostic performance.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaAdultAgedChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID41419640
PMCPMC12859051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.