Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419626›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Resolving coral temperature vulnerability through heat and cold bleaching thresholds.

Yusuf C El-Khaled, Francisca C García, Neus Garcias-Bonet, Matteo Monti, Erika P Santoro, Matilde Marques, Natalie Dunn, Tina Keller-Costa, Christian R Voolstra, Raquel S Peixoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yusuf C El-KhaledDivision of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. yusuf.khaled@kaust.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0401-5520
Francisca C GarcíaDivision of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5363-1015
Neus Garcias-BonetDivision of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6469-7167
Matteo MontiDivision of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Erika P SantoroDivision of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Matilde MarquesInstitute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB) and Institute for Health and Bioeconomy (i4HB), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9443-0893
Natalie DunnDivision of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Tina Keller-CostaInstitute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB) and Institute for Health and Bioeconomy (i4HB), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3702-9192
Christian R VoolstraDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4555-3795
Raquel S PeixotoDivision of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. raquel.peixoto@kaust.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9536-3132

Funding

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) BAS/1/1095-01-01Ministry of Education and Science | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation) CEECIND/00788/2017Ministry of Education and Science | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation) doi.org/10.54499/SFRH/BD/151376/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral bleaching is most commonly associated with heat stress, while cold-water bleaching remains an underrecognized threat. Building upon the widely used ED50 metric for standardized heat tolerance, we introduce a new metric, cold ED50, to quantify cold bleaching thresholds. By comparing cold and heat ED50s, we define the temperature variability range of coral species. To achieve this, we used Coral Bleaching Automated Stress System (CBASS) assays to assess heat and cold temperature tolerance across three Red Sea scleractinian corals (Acropora sp., Pocillopora favosa, Stylophora pistillata) during peak summer and winter along with microbial profiling. Acropora sp. exhibited the highest heat ED50 (38.68 ± 0.39 °C) in summer, while S. pistillata had the lowest cold ED50 (15.63 ± 0.26 °C) in winter. Our results revealed species-specific bacterial communities, with Endozoicomonadaceae dominating across seasons. We show that bleaching thresholds are negatively correlated with the abundance of Endozoicomonadaceae in Acropora sp. during summer. Notably, coral recovery capabilities after extreme temperatures also vary between species. This dual temperature tolerance framework offers a more comprehensive assessment of coral resilience and vulnerability in a rapidly changing climate.

Indexed as

AnthozoaCold TemperatureCoral BleachingHot TemperatureAnimalsSeasons

Identifiers

PMID41419626
PMCPMC12804958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.