ArticleScientific reports2025
SALT: Introducing a framework for hierarchical segmentations in medical imaging using label trees.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional segmentation networks treat anatomical structures as isolated elements, often neglecting their hierarchical relationships. This study introduces Softmax for Arbitrary Label Trees (SALT), a novel method that leverages these hierarchical connections to improve segmentation efficiency and interpretability. SALT is a novel activation function that extends the softmax to arbitrary hierarchical label trees by modeling conditional probabilities along parent-child relations in imaging data. This enables anatomical hierarchies in CT imaging to be represented naturally, allowing segmentations to propagate from broader regions to detailed structures. Using the SAROS dataset from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), which comprises 900 body segmentations from 883 patients and was enhanced by TotalSegmentator to include 113 anatomical labels, the model was trained on 600 scans, with validation and testing on 150. Dice scores across SAROS, CT-ORG, FLARE22, LCTSC, LUNA16, and WORD datasets measured performance, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) from 1000 bootstrapping rounds. SALT achieved top performance on the LUNA16 and SAROS datasets, with Dice scores of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.919-0.938) and 0.929 (95% CI: 0.924-0.933). Reliable accuracy was also observed in CT-ORG (0.891, 95% CI: 0.869-0.906), FLARE22 (0.849, 95% CI: 0.844-0.854), LCTSC (0.908, 95% CI: 0.902-0.914), and WORD (0.844, 95% CI: 0.839-0.85). SALT can segment a 1000-slice CT in 35 s. By leveraging hierarchical body structures, SALT enables rapid whole-body segmentation, processing CT scans in 35 s on average. This capability supports its integration into clinical workflows, enhancing efficiency in automated full-body segmentation and contributing to improved diagnostic workflows and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.