ArticleScientific reports2025
Immunisation decision-making and barriers to vaccine uptake among children under-5 in limited-resource settings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Childhood immunization barriers and interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of access, delivery systems, and health literacy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Health-seeking amid conflict and climate stress: how climate disaster shapes maternal and child healthcare behavior in fragile and conflict-affected settings.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Health-seeking in fragile and conflict-affected settings: how armed violent conflict shapes maternal and child health-seeking behaviours.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Reframing vaccine narrative: a co-production study of a media campaign intervention to address childhood vaccine hesitancy among Nigerian parents and caregivers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunisation coverage remains a fundamental challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, which still has the highest under-five mortality rate in the world, due to wide-ranging drivers that have complicated interventions. Unless the knowledge gaps affecting childhood vaccination decision-making are identified and effectively addressed, low immunisation coverage will persist in the region. This study aims to assess the factors influencing immunisation decision-making among caregivers of children Under-5 years old, and to understand the behaviours that shape these influences. The study employed qualitative methods, such as focus group discussions. Participants were caregivers of children Under-5 years old in Nigeria. A simplified cluster sampling approach was used to select caregivers from four geographical clusters. A minimum of seven caregivers from each cluster were purposively included. The data were analysed deductively using a meta-aggregation approach. The findings show that caregivers’ immunisation decision-making are mainly motivated by: inadequate knowledge about childhood immunisation, especially the conflict between vaccine-preventable and non-vaccine-preventable diseases; masculinity (attitudes of fathers or men can help or hinder immunisation); the child’s gender (the perception of stronger versus weaker sex); misinformation about immunisation (especially the perception that it is a form of family planning). Other influences include the exploitation of caregivers by healthcare workers; incessant stock-outs of vaccines leading to complacent behaviour associated with vaccine hesitancy; religious beliefs; poor attitudes of healthcare workers; among other factors. The factors influencing immunisation decision-making in limited-resource settings and the motivations shaping these behaviours are largely psychological, socio-cultural, behavioural, health system and structural. Interventions designed to address the root causes of gender inequity must start with men’s attitudes and the socio-cultural practices that enable them. Furthermore, the sandwich model for addressing vaccine misinformation seems promising in countering myths and conspiracies about vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.