ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessing clinician performance using a multi-modality clinical decision-support system for lung cancer prognostication.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surgery is the primary treatment for early-stage lung cancer. Adjuvant therapy is offered to patients who are at a high risk of recurrence, however, determining the patients that would benefit from additional therapy is often difficult. In this study, we aimed to develop a clinical decision support system (CDSS) for post-surgery lung cancer prognostication integrating a multi-modality deep learning model (DLM). Pre-operative medical images and clinical, surgical, and pathological information were fed into an externally validated DLM. A CDSS was then developed to display the patient information and DLM results for potential clinical use. Four oncologists evaluated each patient's recurrence probability, their confidence level, and their post-surgery recommendations both with and without the DLM information. The CDSS DLM information demonstrated the potential to improve user prediction performance and confidence. This exploratory study is the first to integrate a multi-modality DLM for prognostication with a CDSS, as well as the first study of clinician attitudes towards CDSSs for lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.