ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning-based high dynamic range 3D reconstruction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction based on fringe projection profilometry (FPP) is a crucial technique for capturing surface topography in high-precision industrial manufacturing. However, overexposure phenomenon frequently occurs in captured images due to variations in object reflectance and lighting conditions, leading to reduced 3D reconstruction accuracy. This represents the most challenging issue in high dynamic range (HDR) environments. To this end, I propose a deep learning-based fringe image restoration method. It utilizes the derivative networks of U-Net to restore saturated fringes, enabling subsequent 3D reconstruction. This method significantly enhances reconstruction accuracy without requiring additional hardware or capturing multiple extra image sets for prediction. I further systematically compared the performance of three network architectures-U-Net, Res-U-Net, and SE-U-Net-in the fringe repair task, revealing their respective capabilities through quantitative experimental analysis. Comparative experiments show that all three networks in this paper can effectively repair saturated fringes, with SE-U-Net exhibiting superior performance in restoring missing regions. This study not only validates the effectiveness of deep learning for repairing saturated fringe images in HDR scenes, but also provides guidance for selecting network models in grating fringe restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.