ArticleScientific reports2025
FDSNet: dynamic multimodal fusion stage selection for autonomous driving via feature disagreement scoring.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robust and efficient 3D perception is critical for autonomous vehicles operating in complex environments. Multi-sensor fusion, such as Camera+LiDAR, Camera+Radar, or all three modalities, significantly enhances scene understanding, However, most existing frameworks fuse data at a fixed stage, categorized as early fusion (raw data level), mid fusion (intermediate feature level), or late fusion (detection output level), neglecting semantic consistency across modalities. This static strategy may result in performance degradation or unnecessary computation under sensor misalignment or noise. In this work, we propose FDSNet (Feature Disagreement Score Network), a dynamic fusion framework that adaptively selects the fusion stage based on measured semantic consistency across sensor modalities. Each sensor stream (Camera, LiDAR, and Radar) independently extracts mid-level features, which are then transformed into a common Bird’s Eye View (BEV) representation, ensuring spatial alignment across modalities. To assess agreement, a Feature Disagreement Score (FDS) is computed at each BEV location by measuring statistical deviation across modality features. These local scores are aggregated into a global FDS value, which is compared against threshold to determine the fusion strategy. A low FDS, indicating strong semantic consistency across modalities, triggers mid-level fusion for computational efficiency, whereas a high FDS value activates late fusion to preserve detection robustness under cross-modal disagreement. We evaluate FDSNet on the nuScenes dataset across multiple configurations: Camera+Radar, Camera+LiDAR, and Camera+Radar+LiDAR. Experimental results demonstrate that FDSNet achieves consistent improvements over recent multimodal baselines, with gains of up to +3.0% in NDS and +2.6% in mAP on the validation set, and +2.1% in NDS and +1.6% in mAP on the test set, highlighting that dynamic stage selection provides both robustness and quantifiable advantages over static fusion strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.