ArticleScientific reports2025
Health impact assessment of decentralization of Emergency Medical Services: a case study in Chonburi Province, Thailand.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The decentralization of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to local administrative organizations is a critical policy initiative in Thailand aimed at enhancing service responsiveness and community participation. This study applied a prospective Health Impact Assessment (HIA) to identify positive and negative health impacts of EMS decentralization in Chonburi Province and develop evidence-based policy recommendations to guide the transition from the Ministry of Public Health to local governance. A mixed-methods approach was designed based on the six-step HIA framework. The study involved 562 participants, including EMS providers, recipients, and policymakers. Qualitative participants were selected through purposive sampling for interviews and focus groups, and quantitative participants through stratified random sampling for surveys. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed, and quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Findings revealed both positive and negative impacts across four pre-hospital care activity domains (dispatch, incident response, referral, and administrative management) and four dimensions of well-being (physical, mental, social, and spiritual). Positive impacts included improved responsiveness, collaboration, and staff motivation, while negative impacts involved personnel shortages, communication gaps, and limited budgets. The derived policy recommendations emphasize structured workforce planning, upgraded communication systems, sustainable financing, and participatory monitoring to strengthen decentralized EMS. The use of HIA provided a systematic and participatory process that translated empirical evidence into actionable policy guidance for health service decentralization in Thailand and similar contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.