Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419523›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Short- and long-term effects of culling invasive corallivorous gastropods.

Baruffaldi Matilde, Roveta Camilla, Tonolini Rosita, Pulido Mantas Torcuato, Cristina Gioia Di Camillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Baruffaldi MatildeNew Heaven Reef Conservation Program, 48 Moo 3, Chalok Ban Kao, Koh Tao, 84360, Thailand.
Roveta CamillaDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences (DiSVA), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche s.n.c, 60131, Ancona, Italy.
Tonolini RositaDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences (DiSVA), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche s.n.c, 60131, Ancona, Italy.
Pulido Mantas TorcuatoDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences (DiSVA), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche s.n.c, 60131, Ancona, Italy.
Cristina Gioia Di CamilloDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences (DiSVA), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche s.n.c, 60131, Ancona, Italy. c.dicamillo@staff.univpm.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eradicating invasive species and maintaining their populations at acceptable densities is both costly and challenging in marine environments, primarily due to the open water connectivity between culled and non-culled areas. This research aims to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of culling invasive species, considering the invasive gastropod Drupella rugosa (Born, 1778) from the coral reefs of Koh Tao (Gulf of Thailand) as a case study. Ecological, logistical, and behavioural factors that influenced the removal efforts were identified, highlighting key components that can inform future strategies aimed at managing outbreak events. Specific objectives included: (1) estimating gastropod densities and to study the behaviour of D. rugosa on Acropora-dominated reefs; (2) assessing short-term effects of D. rugosa removal by monitoring the fate of grazed corals; (3) examining the long-term impact of culling by analysing data from a removal campaign spanning over a decade, including an evaluation of the effort in terms of time and diver involvement. The relationship between damselfish and the feeding activity of corallivorous gastropods was also investigated. A key finding of this study is that poorly planned culling is ineffective in controlling outbreaks of invasive species such as those belonging to the genus Drupella. Long-term data from culling campaigns conducted between 2010 and 2024 revealed that the number of removed specimens remained relatively constant, despite significant differences in effort. This disparity underscores the lack of strategic coordination in the implementation of removal activities. Following a critical comparison with cases reported in the literature, common issues and transferable strategies were identified and thoroughly analyzed. Directions for management were provided, with the understanding that future actions should be grounded in a thorough knowledge of the species' ecological traits, the biotic and abiotic drivers of outbreak events, a quantitative assessment of its impact on Acropora reefs, and integration into with well-established international removal and prevention programs.

Indexed as

AnthozoaCoral ReefsGastropodaIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemThailandBiological invasionsControl of pestsMuricidaeRemovalSurge

Identifiers

PMID41419523
PMCPMC12830875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.