Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419515›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Potential categories and influences on college students' exercise motivation: a latent profile-based analysis.

Xiang Gao, Zihao Li, Yongfan Song, Xiangyu Wang, Liu Chang, Pukui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiang GaoSports Training Institute, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, 510500, China.
Zihao LiInstitute of Physical Education and Training, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Yongfan SongDepartment of Physical Education and Research, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Xiangyu WangDepartment of Physical Education, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Liu ChangDepartment of Physical Education and Research, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Pukui WangDepartment of Physical Education and Research, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China. t24189@fzu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on self-determination theory, this study aimed to explore the latent heterogeneous profile structures of exercise motivation among Chinese college students. Furthermore, it systematically examined the predictive effects of demographic variables and social relationship factors on different motivation categories, as well as the differences among these categories concerning perceived academic stress and physical education class engagement. Utilizing a convenience cluster sampling method, 1346 college students (54.75% male) from three universities in North, East, and South China were recruited as participants. Measurements were conducted using the exercise motivation scale, Perceived academic stress scale, and physical education class engagement scale. Latent profile analysis was employed to identify motivation latent profiles. Subsequently, multinomial logistic regression was used to test the predictive variables, and the BCH method was applied to compare differences in outcome variables across the identified profiles. Latent profile analysis identified five distinct motivation profiles: (1) Low-binding type (11.5%), characterized by the lowest levels across all motivation dimensions and autonomy; (2) Identified regulation type (30.2%), the largest profile, marked by prominent identified regulation and intrinsic motivation; (3) External regulation type (27.8%), dominated by controlled motivation; (4) High autonomy type (15.2%), exhibiting the highest levels of autonomous motivation; and (5) High-binding type (15.3%), maintaining relatively high levels across all motivation dimensions. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that gender and grade level did not significantly predict profile membership. In contrast, social relationship factors were key predictors. Students with exercise companions were more likely to belong to the Identified regulation type and High-binding type. Those in a romantic relationship had a significantly higher probability of belonging to the high autonomy type, high-binding type, and external regulation type. Regarding outcome variables, students in the high autonomy type reported the lowest levels of perceived academic stress, whereas those in the high-binding type reported the highest. Concerning PE class engagement, both the high autonomy and High-binding type demonstrated significantly higher levels compared to the other categories. Significant group heterogeneity exists in the exercise motivation of Chinese college students. The high-binding type may represent a unique motivational configuration within the specific Chinese cultural context. The findings indicate that, compared to static demographic characteristics, dynamic social relationship factors are pivotal in shaping college students' motivation patterns. Physical education in higher institutions should emphasize fostering supportive social environments to promote the internalization and integration of student motivation. Moreover, cultivating high autonomous motivation may not only benefit exercise behavior itself but could also serve as a potential psychological resource for helping students cope with academic stress and enhance classes engagement.

Indexed as

ExerciseMotivationStudentsAdolescentAdultChinaFemaleHumansMalePersonal AutonomySurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultAcademic stressCollege studentsExercise motivationLatent profileStudy engagement

Identifiers

PMID41419515
PMCPMC12717056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.