ArticleScientific reports2025
Intelligent information management enables quality-by-design in pharmaceutical production.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re-engineering insulin for oral delivery: structural modifications, advanced formulation strategies, and future directions.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Hot-Melt Processed Glibenclamide Glassy Solutions: A Novel Oral Delivery Platform for Enhanced Bioavailability in Diabetes.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Biomaterials in personalized drug delivery: innovations, challenges, and future directions.PeerJ · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pharmaceutical industry is undergoing a paradigm shift towards digitalization and smart manufacturing under the Pharma 4.0 framework, with a growing emphasis on integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Quality-by-Design (QbD) principles. This study proposes an AI-powered information management framework to enhance predictive quality control, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency in pharmaceutical production. The framework consolidates structured process and product datasets with unstructured regulatory documents, enabling comprehensive data integration and decision support. Machine learning and deep learning models were employed to predict critical quality attributes (CQAs) from CPPs, while natural language processing (NLP) was applied to manage regulatory documentation. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, including SHAP and LIME, were integrated to ensure interpretability and compliance with ICH Q8–Q11 guidelines. Experimental evaluations demonstrated the superior predictive accuracy, robustness, and scalability of deep learning approaches compared to traditional QbD methods such as Design of Experiments (DoE) and regression. Statistical hypothesis testing confirmed that the observed improvements were significant (p < 0.01), while ablation studies highlighted the critical role of NLP, dimensionality reduction, and XAI modules in ensuring compliance and efficiency. Benchmarking results further established that the proposed framework outperforms conventional approaches in adaptability to high-dimensional, large-scale datasets, with deep learning models demonstrating resilience under noise, missing data, and process variability. The findings underscore the transformative potential of AI-powered QbD frameworks for advancing smart pharmaceutical production. By integrating predictive analytics, explainability, and regulatory alignment, the proposed approach provides a scalable and compliant pathway toward Pharma 4.0, enabling continuous improvement and patient-centric outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.