Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419500›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Integrating multi-omics and clinical features to model survival in epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes.

Raghda E Eldesouki, Omar Tarek, Hassan Morsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A multimodal MRI radiomics model for distinguishing borderline from malignant ovarian epithelial tumors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raghda E EldesoukiGenetics Unit, Department of Histology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. reldeso23@gmail.com.
Omar TarekFaculty of Engineering, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Hassan MorsiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. hassanmorsi@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) exhibits significant heterogeneity in clinical outcomes, influenced by histology, age, stage, and molecular characteristics. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive model integrating demographic, clinical, and molecular data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to predict two-year survival outcomes in EOC. The cohort included 2,427 patients with Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma (EA)s and Serous Cystadenocarcinoma (SC) , of whom 1,011 had gene data. Machine learning models, including Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest, were trained and evaluated for predictive performance. SVM provided the optimal balance of mortality-class detection and overall performance. While GBC achieved the highest ROC-AUC (0.81), SVM demonstrated superior recall for mortality cases (0.70 vs. 0.61), which was prioritized given our clinical objective. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analyses revealed that WT1, HOXA11, TPM4, TMPRSS2, MUC16, SDHD, and MYC were the most influential predictors of mortality, along with age at diagnosis. Differential gene expression and enrichment analyses identified distinct age- and stage-associated molecular profiles, with genes involved in cell cycle regulation, tumor microenvironment, and growth factor signaling showing significant upregulation. Mutational analyses revealed histology-specific patterns, with TP53, PIK3CA, and ZFHX3 highly mutated in SC, while PTEN and ARID1A were more prevalent in EA. Several mutations, including TP53, FAT3, and FAT4 in EA, and CSMD3 in SC, were associated with poorer survival. Integrating multivariate predictive modeling with biological interpretation provides a comprehensive framework for personalized risk stratification and treatment decision-making in EOC. The identified prognostic biomarkers, such as TPM4, SDHD, MUC16, and BCL6, represent potential targets for future studies and therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedMultiomicsPrognosisSupport Vector MachineBiomarkers, TumorEndometrioid adenocarcinoma (EA)Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)Gene expressionIntegrative analysisMachine learningMolecular signaturesPrognostic biomarkersSerous cystadenocarcinoma (SC)Survival predictionThe Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)

Identifiers

PMID41419500
PMCPMC12722313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.