Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419465›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Evidence for high-frequency hearing in a Permian stem reptile.

Kelsey M Jenkins, Rachel C Fleming, Juan D Daza, Hans-Dieter Sues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelsey M JenkinsDepartment of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA. jenkinskel@si.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6345-6553
Rachel C FlemingDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Juan D DazaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-0240
Hans-Dieter SuesDepartment of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9911-7254

Funding

Smithsonian | National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) Peter Buck Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-frequency hearing evolved in most amniote lineages in the Permian and Triassic. However, for reptiles, the evolutionary history of hearing is more elusive. Some have suggested that tympanic hearing evolved independently in each major lineage of reptile, largely based on gross observations of the stapes and outer ear region of fossils. On that basis, it was postulated that many Permian stem reptiles could not hear high frequencies. However, this hypothesis lacks quantitative support. To our knowledge, biomechanical analyses have not previously been conducted to determine the capacity for hearing in stem reptiles. Here, we conduct functional and morphometric analyses of the reptilian stapes including fossil data. Using harmonic response analyses, we demonstrate that the stapes of the stem reptile Youngina capensis could be displaced proximodistally at values similar to tympanic squamates. Additionally, Y. capensis is predicted to possess a tympanum based on a flexible discriminant analysis, while early-diverging stem reptiles are classified as low-frequency bone conductors. We show that hearing was facilitated by the formation of the annular ligament, improving stapedial movement, in addition to the evolution of a slender stapes and tympanum. Our results suggest that relatively high-frequency hearing was present in the common ancestor of reptiles, originating by the late Permian.

Indexed as

HearingReptilesAnimalsBiological EvolutionEar, MiddleFossilsStapes

Identifiers

PMID41419465
PMCPMC12783099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.