ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026
Osteophyte Growth Over 10 Years in the Fingers of High-Level Climbers and Contributing Factors.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of Finger in Sport Climbing in Different Age Groups.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Osteophyte Growth Over 10 Years in the Fingers of High-Level Climbers and Contributing Factors.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although osteophytes in climbers' fingers are known as part of a mechano-adaption, the progression of osteophytes and contributing factors during an advanced elite climber's career is still unknown. This study analyzes osteophyte growth over 10 years for each phalangeal head and base of all proximal and distal interphalangeal joints (PIP and DIP) individually as well as the impact of potential climbing related influencing factors. Furthermore, the osteophytes located at the palmar neck of the proximal phalanx (palmar neck osteophytes) were investigated separately and joint space narrowing was evaluated and compared with osteophyte growth. Radiographs of 31 male elite climbers were analyzed in lateral view for osteophytes and in anterior-posterior (a.p.) view for joint space at baseline and 10-year follow-up. Even after more than 2 decades of elite climbing, osteophytes grew significantly at most phalangeal heads and bases. Already severely affected joints at baseline, specifically DIP Dig III and IV of both hands, had an especially high effect size (DIP base: Dig III: left; 0.517, right; 0.355, Dig IV: left; 0.519, right; 0.555, DIP head: Dig III: left; 0.348, right; 0.591, Dig IV: left; 0.533, right; 0.408). The extent of osteophytes at baseline is highly predictive for further development (79.3%); however, no climbing-related factors were determinable for additional explanation. Palmar neck osteophytes are pathognomonic to climbing as they are most likely caused by the phalangeal base hitting this area repeatedly in a hyperflexed position. Furthermore, there is no correlation between osteophyte growth and joint space narrowing during an elite climber's career.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.