ArticleBMJ open2025
Implementation of starfish sampling for invisibilised populations: a methods protocol of the BRAVE multi-site cross-sectional community-based participatory study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Centering Undocumented Immigrants: A Cross-Sectional Study of Sexual and Reproductive Health of Undocumented Asian and Latinx Immigrants in California.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmigrant populations, particularly undocumented immigrants, are often considered 'hidden' or 'hard to reach' in research. This invisibilisation-under-representation or exclusion in data collection-leads to data inequities and biased findings that fail to capture their unique experiences. Starfish sampling mitigates selection bias and improves access to invisibilised populations by recruiting 'seed' participants at randomly selected times and locations and leveraging their social networks to recruit the next wave of participants. In this protocol paper, we outline the sampling strategy for the BRAVE (Building community, Raising All immigrant Voices for health Equity) study, a multi-site, cross-sectional survey examining the relationship between immigration history and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) service utilisation among Asian immigrant women in the USA. This protocol is an adaptation of novel starfish sampling in combination with various data tools and a community-based participatory research approach. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using data from the American Community Survey and insights from community partners, we will conduct community mapping across four study sites (Atlanta, Houston, Los Angeles County and New York City). We will select census tracts that reflect the primary ethnic groups of interest and diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. From these selected census tracts, we will construct a venue universe by identifying key activity areas for Asian immigrant women through data scraping from online sources. We will then randomly select venue-date-time combinations and deliberately choose various community engagement events for recruitment. Culturally competent field officers who are fluent in Asian languages will recruit participants at these events. Participants can refer up to three peers from their social networks to take part in the survey. Results will be presented as descriptive statistics and logistic regression models to test the association between immigration history and SRH service utilisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The overarching BRAVE study protocol was approved by the University of California Los Angeles Institutional Review Board (IRB) (IRB-22-0493-AM-016). The results will be disseminated through academic journal publications and relevant data will be shared with our community partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.