ArticleBMJ open2025
Experiences and outcomes of peer navigation and support interventions for adolescents on HIV treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences and Outcomes of Peer Navigation and Support Interventions for Adolescents on HIV Treatment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) globally report lower rates of viral suppression because of challenges to remain adherent and engage in HIV treatment. Psychosocial support is critical to meet the unique needs of ALHIV. Peer navigation has been found to be effective in supporting adults in ART adherence, but the evidence for adolescents is scant. Given the large proportion of adolescents on ART in sub-Saharan Africa, peers hold promise to deliver psychosocial support. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis is to review qualitative and mixed-methods studies describing experiences of peer navigation and support interventions for ALHIV on ART in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The population-concept-context configuration will be applied to identify suitable studies on ALHIV and on ART (population) and experiences of peer navigation and support (concept) and conducted in sub-Saharan African countries (context). The review will only include studies published in the English language. The following databases will be searched: PubMed, Wiley Library Online, EbscoHost (PsycArticles), MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, WHO database and Google Scholar, for eligible qualitative studies published from January 2015 (to ensure relevance) to November 2025. Two-stage screening will be done by two reviewers independently. Extracted data will be thematically analysed with Atlas.Ti (v25) software. A narrative synthesis will be conducted to describe the reported outcomes, experiences and challenges with receiving and delivery of peer navigation and support interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. The review will adhere to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research reporting guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this qualitative evidence synthesis. The findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to via conference proceedings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024541951.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.