Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419258›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Addressing health information inequities: making evidence-based clinical content more accessible in low- and middle-income primary care.

Ruth Vania Cornick, Sandy Claire Picken, Ajibola Awotiwon, Mareike Rabe, Camilla Wattrus, Tasneem Fredericks, Venessa Timmerman, Lara R Fairall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruth Vania CornickKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa ruth.cornick@uct.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-7391-3383
Sandy Claire PickenKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Observatory, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2651-5980
Ajibola AwotiwonKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0887-8670
Mareike RabeUniversity of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9476-7867
Camilla WattrusKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2075-7903
Tasneem Fredericksknowledge translation unit, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.ORCID 0009-0000-9584-1408
Venessa TimmermanKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Observatory, South Africa.
Lara R FairallKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7460-4670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disparity in access to trustworthy health information between high-income and low-income settings remains stark and contributes to global health inequity. The volume of new clinical practice guidelines a healthcare provider needs to digest to deliver up-to-date, evidence-based care is overwhelming, particularly in primary care, where the scope is comprehensive. However, many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) lack the resources to tailor guidance for their realities. International standards for adaptation or adoption of existing guidelines tend to focus on a single clinical topic and still require considerable evidence synthesis expertise, slowing provision of up-to-date, relevant protocols for the primary care provider.The Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) guide covers most conditions managed in primary care. It has been introduced to South Africa, Ethiopia, Brazil, Nigeria, Botswana and Indonesia to support primary care reforms. This paper describes the reference repository and updating mechanisms underpinning the PACK Global guide (that forms a template for local adaptation) so that it reflects latest international evidence and WHO guidance. The referencing and updating mechanism to curate its 3689 recommendations drew on the established evidence synthesis processes of the British Medical Journal's Best Practice and the WHO. The challenges of maintaining this content set were largely funding and resource constraints in our small team. We are exploring how advances in generative artificial intelligence might expedite review of the large clinical guidelines and policies required for PACK updates as well as address limitations of current database software as a content management system, to facilitate editorial and publication processes.Leveraging existing evidence synthesis processes appears to be a feasible approach to maintaining a comprehensive LMIC primary care clinical content set and may go some way to improving access to up-to-date health information, thus addressing global health inequities.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesEvidence-Based MedicineHealthcare DisparitiesPrimary Health CareHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareGlobal HealthHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID41419258
PMCPMC12917359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.