Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41418281›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Identification of Design Requirements for a Software Application for Use by Clinicians That Collects Acute Stroke Treatment Data During Clinical Workflow: Pilot Study.

Adam Forward, Gizem Koca, Aymane Sahli, Noreen Kamal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam ForwardDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-5703-911X
Gizem KocaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3186-2426
Aymane SahliDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-9011
Noreen KamalDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5957-2183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical registries are critical for monitoring processes of care in diseases and driving quality improvements. However, many smaller hospitals lack the required resources to collect the necessary data to contribute to registries.

objectiveThis study aims to design and evaluate a data collection tool for acute stroke treatment that streamlines the collection of process data and provides tools to aid clinician users while not interfering with clinical workflow. The evaluation will identify key design requirements that facilitate prospective data collection and add value for clinicians.

methodsWe developed a prototype tool for testing using Figma Pro for use on an iPad. Clinicians were recruited through convenience sampling to test the prototype's use in a small-scale simulated clinical field experiment, during which participant were asked to think aloud and then complete a series of tasks to mimic a mock stroke treatment while inputting the required data into the prototype. Follow-up semistructured interviews were conducted to gain feedback on how the prototype integrated into the workflow and on the aspects of the prototype they felt helped and hindered their use of it. Qualitative data analysis combined review of the experiment recordings to identify the most frequent errors made during the scenario and deductive thematic analysis from the follow-up interviews to determine user needs for the following prototype iteration. The insights from the feedback identified design requirements that were implemented in the iterated design and documented to provide a reference for future product designers.

resultsThree participants were recruited from 2 hospitals between April 18 and June 6, 2024, for the simulated field experiment. The scenario took 10-12 minutes, with 1.2-3.7 minutes spent using the prototype, depending on whether optional features such as the NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) calculator were used. The simple and condensed layout and features such as NIHSS calculators, benchmark metric timers, and the final pop-up summary received the most positive feedback from each participant. Issues identified included small target sizes causing higher error rates, lack of color in important features reducing their visibility, and grouping of mandatory and optional information field layouts leading to a disjointed flow. The key design requirements include prioritizing simple dynamic layouts, sufficient target sizes to prevent errors, useful features with clear visual cues, and prompt data feedback to facilitate seamless integration.

conclusionsA prospective data collection tool for clinicians to use during stroke treatment can add value for clinicians and, with further testing, can be integrated into workflow. The design requirements identified through this study can provide a basis for streamlining the collection of accurate data while increasing the value of the tool for users and should be considered by future product designers to add value to their software and improve user experience.

Indexed as

Data CollectionSoftwareSoftware DesignStrokeWorkflowFemaleHumansMalePilot Projectsdata collectionmedical technologysimulated field testsoftwareuser interface design

Identifiers

PMID41418281
PMCPMC12759296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.