ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2026
Assessing Functional Changes With the Integration of Wrist Flexion Into a Myoelectric Prosthesis.
Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of wrist flexion on task performance and compensatory movements in transradial prosthesis users.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates functional performance using a two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) prosthetic wrist compared to a single-degree-of-freedom (1DOF) wrist in individuals with transradial (below-elbow) amputation. Five participants were fitted with a custom-designed 2DOF prosthetic wrist system integrated with an Ottobock Transcarpal hand and operated via a pattern recognition-based myoelectric control interface. Participants completed two test conditions: one using wrist rotation alone (1DOF, NoWF), and another using wrist rotation combined with wrist flexion and extension (2DOF, WF). A battery of standardized functional assessments was used to evaluate performance in both conditions, including the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP), Box and Blocks Test (BBT), Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), Activity Measure for Upper Limb Amputees (AM-ULA), Clothespin Relocation Task (CRT), and the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC). Across all outcome measures, no statistically significant differences were found between the 1DOF and 2DOF conditions. While the lack of measurable improvement may reflect the influence of factors inherent to the 2DOF design, such as its greater length, added mass compared to 1DOF wrists, or increased control complexity, the results nonetheless indicate that the addition of a second wrist degree of freedom did not compromise functional performance. These findings suggest that more complex multi-DOF systems can be implemented without detriment to user function, an encouraging result for the continued development of advanced upper-limb prosthetic technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.