Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417953›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025

Etiology-specific optimal timing of surgical intervention for intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Nada Mostafa Al-Dardery, Dina Essam Abo-Elnour, Sadil Mohammad Bani Khaled, Alyaa Khaled Madeeh, Shahd Alqato, Suhel F Batarseh, Mariam A Abusalah, Amr Diaaeldin Sayed Mahmoud, Wesal Nasr Mahmoud, Abdulrhman M Khaity

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nada Mostafa Al-DarderyFaculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Dina Essam Abo-ElnourFaculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Sadil Mohammad Bani KhaledFaculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Alyaa Khaled MadeehFaculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Shahd AlqatoInternal Medicine Department, Arab Medical Center, Amman, Jordan.
Suhel F BatarsehFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan.
Mariam A AbusalahFaculry of Medicine, Al Quds University, Al Azhar branch, Gaza, Palestine.
Amr Diaaeldin Sayed MahmoudFaculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Wesal Nasr MahmoudFaculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Abdulrhman M KhaityFaculty of Medicine, Elrazi University, Khartoum, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracranial hemorrhages (ICrH), including intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH), are life-threatening conditions leading to high mortality and long-term disability. A persistent challenge in clinical practice is identifying the most advantageous timing for surgical intervention, as existing literature reveals conflicting outcomes regarding survival, neurological recovery, and complication rates. The literature remains heterogeneous despite extensive research, presenting conflicting evidence regarding survival benefits across various surgical timeframes, from ultra-early interventions (<6 hours) to delayed interventions (>7 days). This study aimed to determine the optimal timing for surgery in intracranial bleeding by comparing outcomes across timeframes to guide evidence-based clinical decisions.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published from 2000 to 2025. Twenty-eight observational studies, including 5919 patients, were included. Data were analyzed using random-effects models in R software, with subgroup analyses based on the time windows and type of hemorrhage.

resultsSurgery performed within 24 hours significantly reduced the odds of poor Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92) and rebleeding (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37-0.80). The network meta-analysis indicated that surgery within 48 hours is the most effective timing for reducing mortality (P-score = 0.99). However, pairwise comparisons revealed non-significant effects (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.51-1.72), underscoring the necessity for etiology-specific interpretation. Early intervention (≤72 hours) was most beneficial in aSAH, whereas ultra-early surgery (<6 hours) in traumatic ICH showed higher mortality. Surgery delayed beyond 7 days resulted in worse functional recovery.

conclusionsEarly surgical intervention, particularly within 24-48 hours, improves outcomes in many cases of ICH. However, optimal timing varies with hemorrhage type. The findings resolve previous discrepancies by illustrating that treatment effects are contingent upon both the timeframe and the underlying pathology. Personalized timing strategies are essential, and further high-quality randomized trials are needed to refine clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

intracranial hemorrhagenetwork meta-analysisneurosurgerysurgical timing

Identifiers

PMID41417953
PMCPMC13105746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.