Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Matthew J WitneyJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0939-710X
Nathan P CroftImmunity Program and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2128-5127
Yik Chun WongJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0487-1714
Stewart SmithJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5806-7361
Inge E A FleschJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Erica KellerJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-0600-1721
Leon Cw LinJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8412-4005
Yanli LiJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6190-9849
Nicole L La GrutaImmunity Program and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5358-9363
Anthony W PurcellImmunity Program and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0532-8331
David C TscharkeJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6825-9172
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
CD8
Indexed as
Antigen PresentationCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopes, T-LymphocytePoxviridaeVacciniaVaccinia virusAnimalsAntigens, ViralHistocompatibility Antigens Class IMiceAntigens, ViralEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class I
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
A poxvirus model reveals general correlates of antigen presentation and immunogenicity for viral CD8 · full record | OpenQuestion