Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417866›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Zero-shot deep learning for the annotation of unknown eDNA sequences using co-occurrences and phylogenetic embeddings.

Steven Stalder, Théophile Sanchez, Michele Volpi, Stéphanie Manel, David Mouillot, Arnaud Auber, Morgane Bruno, Virginie Marques, Camille Albouy, Loïc Pellissier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Steven StalderSwiss Data Science Center, ETH Zürich and EPFL, Zürich, Switzerland.
Théophile SanchezEcosystems and Landscape Evolution, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Michele VolpiSwiss Data Science Center, ETH Zürich and EPFL, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2771-0750
Stéphanie ManelCEFE, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France.
David MouillotMARBEC, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Arnaud AuberIfremer, HMMN, Laboratoire Ressources Halieutiques, Boulogne-sur-Mer, France.
Morgane BrunoCEFE, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Virginie MarquesEcosystems and Landscape Evolution, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Camille AlbouyEcosystems and Landscape Evolution, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1629-2389
Loïc PellissierEcosystems and Landscape Evolution, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2289-8259

Funding

FishPredictSwiss Data Science Center (SDSC)Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding marks a transformative era in large-scale biodiversity monitoring. However, the analysis of eDNA datasets is limited by incomplete reference databases and the increasing volume of data requiring processing from raw sequences to annotated taxonomic lists. To curate taxonomic lists from eDNA analysis, geographic constraints are used by expert in post-analysis, which may introduce potential biases in assignments. Instead of relying on expert intervention, a combination of taxonomic and geographic co-occurrences could be directly integrated into machine learning to automatize and improve taxonomic annotation. Here, we introduce a deep learning approach applied to the taxonomic assignment of eDNA sequences, which leverages a species reference database, species co-occurrence data, and a phylogeny to enhance annotation directly from raw sequences. The phylogeny provides the structure to the network's embedding space in which DNA sequences are placed utilizing an artificial neural network (ANN). We train an additional ANN from the phylogenetic embedding and co-occurrence species data to learn coherent species combinations from the whole collection of eDNA sequences, as opposed to single sequences only. When applied directly to the raw sequences, this method correctly predicts unseen species (i.e., those not contained in the reference database), out of more than 31,000 possibilities, in about 24% of the tested cases by relying on phylogenetic embeddings and geographic modulation. The trained ANNs discern species relationships accurately from the raw data, which facilitates the process of associating sequences with taxa-even those absent from reference databases. When we use real eDNA samples, our predictions mostly agree with those from a traditional bioinformatic pipeline, highlighting the potential of our method for the annotation of the increasing number of eDNA sequences.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, EnvironmentalMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenyBiodiversityComputational BiologyNeural Networks, ComputerDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID41417866
PMCPMC12747428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.