Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417857›Full record

ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2026

Effect of Occlusal Adjustment and Subsequent Repolishing on the Translucency Parameter, Contact Angle, and Flexural Strength of Different Types of Glazed Monolithic Zirconia.

Kelli Nunes Monteiro, Rafaela Paschoalin Nigro, Stéphanie Soares Favero, Ranulfo Benedito de Paula Miranda, Estevam Augusto Bonfante, Paulo Francisco Cesar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelli Nunes MonteiroDepartamento de Biomateriais e Biologia Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafaela Paschoalin NigroDepartamento de Biomateriais e Biologia Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Stéphanie Soares FaveroDepartamento de Biomateriais e Biologia Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ranulfo Benedito de Paula MirandaDepartamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2694-5494
Estevam Augusto BonfanteDepartamento de Prótese e Periodontia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6867-8350
Paulo Francisco CesarDepartamento de Biomateriais e Biologia Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-105X

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 301205/2019-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 887616400/2021-00Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 23072.238646/2022-33Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 23072.270022/2022-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluated the effects of material and surface condition (glazed vs. polished after simulated occlusal adjustment) on translucency parameter, contact angle, and flexural strength of four monolithic zirconia. MATERIALS AND

methodsDisk-shaped specimens (n = 80, Ø12 × 1 mm) were fabricated from four monolithic zirconia materials: Prettau 4 Anterior (PA), Lava Plus (LP), Cercon hT (hT), and Cercon xT (xT). All specimens were glazed; half underwent simulated occlusal adjustment followed by polishing. Translucency was measured with a spectrophotometer, contact angle with a goniometer, and flexural strength using a piston-on-three-balls test. Data were analyzed via ANOVA.

resultsTranslucency parameter values ranged from 3.9ᶜ (PA-Polished) to 6.9ᵃ (xT-Glazed), while contact angle (°) values ranged from 13.4ᵈ (hT-Glazed) to 43.7ᵃ (xT-Polished). Flexural strength (MPa) in the glazed condition was 410.4ᵇᶜ (PA), 577.5ᵇ (LP), 576.5ᵇ (hT), and 384.5ᵇᶜ (xT); under polishing, values were 333.1ᶜ (PA), 228.8ᶜ (LP), 856.0ᵃ (hT), and 287.1ᶜ (xT).

conclusionsThe xT group exhibited a higher translucency parameter compared to the LP and PA groups. Polishing increased the contact angle for all materials. Polishing subsequent to occlusal adjustment simulation preserved the flexural strength of two zirconia ceramics (PA and xT), resulted in a reduction in one (LP), and led to an increase in another (hT).

Indexed as

Dental MaterialsDental PolishingFlexural StrengthOcclusal AdjustmentZirconiumDental Stress AnalysisHumansMaterials TestingSurface PropertiesDental MaterialsZirconiumzirconium oxidecontact angleflexural strengthglazedmonolithicpolishingtranslucency parameterzirconia

Identifiers

PMID41417857
PMCPMC13069226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.